Investment Fraud
Fake platforms showing fake returns. Your deposits were real. We trace them to the cash-out point.
The fraudster hid behind a fake name and a slick website. But the crypto you sent moved on a public ledger, and that ledger does not forget. We read it, we find the freeze point, we act. No win, no fee. $0 upfront.
You probably already tried. The bank said the transfer was authorized. The police took a report and wished you luck. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre logged it. Nobody froze anything.
That is not because they do not care. It is because crypto fraud crosses borders in seconds, and Canadian institutions have no power over an exchange registered in Seychelles or a wallet hosted in Singapore. Private legal action does. That is our entire job.
We trace your coins from your wallet to the point where they touch the regulated financial system. Then our Swiss counsel at SarahLegal.co serves freeze orders that exchanges actually comply with. This is how fraud recovery works when the fraudster is offshore. Which they always are.
Fake platforms showing fake returns. Your deposits were real. We trace them to the cash-out point.
Long-con romance-investment fraud. The scammer was patient. So are we, and the blockchain is on our side.
Fake exchange support, fake CRA calls, fake "security teams." Every wallet they gave you is traceable.
The platform demands taxes or fees before releasing funds. That is the second fraud. Stop paying and let us trace the first one.
The assessment is free. The trace is free. If we do not see a recovery path, you walk away owing nothing and knowing the truth.
No win, no fee means exactly that. If recovery fails, our invoice is zero. We take the risk because we only accept cases where the trace shows a real freeze point.
Typically 12.5% of what we recover, paid after the money is in your account. You never send us crypto. You never pay upfront. Ever.
Verify us: Hong Kong Companies Registry, CR 61832470, active since 2013.
Fraud is not one crime. It is a family of schemes that share a common spine: a victim is persuaded to transfer crypto voluntarily, under false pretenses. Because the transfer is technically authorized, banks wash their hands of it. Because the crypto moves offshore, police cannot reach it. Recovery lives in the gap between those two facts, and closing that gap starts with knowing exactly which species of fraud hit you.
The highest-loss category. A relationship built over weeks or months, then a gradual introduction to a trading platform the scammer controls. The name refers to fattening the victim before the slaughter. Markers: the contact came from a dating app or a wrong-number message, the platform was introduced by the person, small withdrawals worked early, and large withdrawals triggered fees, taxes or silence. The wallets behind these operations serve dozens of victims at once, which makes them some of the most traceable infrastructure in the fraud economy.
Standalone fraud sites built from kits: real charts, real support chat, fake balances. Bitwisenex, 4XAI, Click Trades, Coin Effect and Europe FX are examples we hold active claims against. Markers: deposits are effortless, the dashboard shows consistent wins, and the first serious withdrawal attempt produces an invented obstacle. The platform's deposit wallets are the forensic entry point.
Fake CRA agents, fake bank security teams, fake exchange support, fake police. The victim is told their account is compromised or that they owe taxes, and directed to pay in crypto, often via a crypto ATM. Markers: urgency, threats, and payment demanded in crypto or gift cards. No legitimate Canadian agency ever demands crypto. Ever. The ATM receipt and exchange records document the transfers.
Pure emergency fraud: a online partner needs money for a medical crisis, a customs fee, a plane ticket. Smaller individual transfers, but they accumulate, and the wallets are just as traceable. Handled with complete confidentiality, always.
The technical branch of the family. A cloned website, a fake airdrop, a malicious approval signature. The victim's wallet is emptied without any relationship at all. Markers: a transaction you did not authorize, or an approval you did not understand. The drainer's addresses are public, and their cash-out patterns are well documented.
A token launches, hype builds, liquidity pools fill, and the developers drain the pool and vanish. Markers: anonymous teams, unaudited contracts, and price charts that go vertical then to zero. Recovery traces the deployer wallets and the exit transactions to their cash-out points.
Fraud recovery is two disciplines running in parallel. Understanding both helps you evaluate any firm you talk to, including us.
Everything starts with the transaction hash. From it, forensic tools map the complete flow: your wallet to the scammer's receiving address, then through consolidation wallets, swaps, bridges and splits. The analysis uses clustering heuristics to group addresses under single control, exchange attribution databases to identify deposit wallets, and timing analysis to track value through obfuscation attempts. The output is not a screenshot. It is a documented trace with methodology that survives legal scrutiny.
The trace identifies where to act. The law is how we act. Preservation requests go to exchanges immediately, because major platforms freeze on documented notice from verifiable legal entities. Court orders follow: freezing injunctions to lock the assets, disclosure orders to unmask the account holder, and then the substantive claim. Fraud, unjust enrichment, and proprietary claims each fit different fact patterns, and choosing wrong wastes months. That choice is what legal experience is for.
The forensic report must be written for a judge, not an engineer. The legal filing must cite the trace accurately, because a technically sloppy filing gives the exchange's lawyers a reason to stall. Our forensic partner and legal counsel work on the same files simultaneously, which is why our packages move through exchange compliance teams faster than assembled-after-the-fact submissions.
A judgment ordering the return of frozen crypto is only as good as its enforcement. The final step is execution: the exchange releases the frozen assets under the order, funds are converted, and recovery lands in your account. Cases close when the money moves, not when the judge signs. We stay on files until the transfer clears.
Canadian clients ask two questions first: can you recover it, and how long will it take. The first is answered by the free trace. The second depends on factors worth understanding in detail.
Cases move fast when three conditions align. The coins reached a major exchange with an established legal process team. The victim engaged us within weeks of the loss, before the cash-out completed. And the operation is already known to us, so the forensic and legal groundwork exists. Group claims against platforms like Bitwisenex and 4XAI run on this track.
Most cases. The freeze lands, disclosure unmasks the account holder, the claim is filed, and resolution comes through negotiation or uncontested judgment. The variables are the exchange's response time, the court's calendar, and whether the defendant appears to contest.
Cases involving multiple jurisdictions, contested claims, or assets split across several exchanges take longer. Cases requiring orders from slower courts take longer. We tell you at the assessment stage which track your case is on, and we update you when it moves. What we never do is promise a timeline we cannot see into.
Speed at the start. Every week between the theft and the freeze request is a week the operation uses to move money beyond reach. The 24-hour assessment exists to collapse that delay. It costs nothing, it commits you to nothing, and it is the single highest-leverage action a fraud victim can take.
Fraud means you were deceived into sending the crypto yourself. Theft means it was taken without your authorization, through a hack or a drain. The distinction matters legally because it shapes the claim, but the forensic work is identical: the coins moved, the ledger recorded it, and the trail can be followed.
No. It is normal. Nearly every fraud platform is registered in a jurisdiction chosen for weak enforcement. Recovery does not depend on suing the platform where it is registered. It depends on freezing the assets where they sit, which is usually a major exchange in a completely different country.
Yes, and those extra payments are additional claims in the same case. They also strengthen the fraud evidence, because demanding payment to release funds is itself proof of the scheme. Document them like any other transfer.
Common, and actually useful. An operating platform is still collecting from new victims, which means its wallets are active and its cash-out channels are warm. Stop depositing, keep the account open, do not tip them off, and start the trace. What they say to you no longer matters. What their wallets do does.
Usually not for the crypto leg. Canadian banks sometimes reimburse the initial fiat transfer if it was unauthorized, but fraud victims authorized their own transfers, which is what makes these cases hard. Report to the bank anyway, because policies evolve and a police report helps. Then pursue the crypto side with us, because that is where the money actually is.
Through pattern evidence. A bad investment loses money on real trades. A fraud platform fabricates the entire environment: rigged dashboards, blocked withdrawals, invented fees, and wallets that consolidate victim deposits rather than trade them. The blockchain shows where the money actually went, and it is never into real trading.
Both. We handle corporate files where a business paid a fraudulent invoice in crypto, was hit by a business-email-compromise variant, or lost treasury funds to a fake platform. Corporate cases involve extra documentation but the same trace-freeze-claim spine.
Tell us, and tell them. Group claims share forensic costs, share legal groundwork, and apply combined pressure on exchanges. A platform that stole from twenty Canadians is a stronger case than twenty separate complaints. If your contacts are hesitant, they can each start with the free individual assessment.
No. It helps. A police report is independent documentation of the crime, dated and official, and it strengthens the evidence package. Criminal and civil tracks run in parallel without conflict. We encourage every client to report, and we format our forensic reports so police can use them.
Waiting. Not from laziness, but from the perfectly human need to process what happened before acting. The scammer's cash-out schedule does not wait. The free assessment exists so that processing and acting can happen at the same time: send the transaction IDs today, think about next steps tomorrow, lose nothing in the meantime.
Investment fraud is the highest-loss fraud category reported to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, with cryptocurrency the dominant payment rail. Pig butchering schemes produce the largest average per-victim losses. Authorities estimate only 5 to 10 percent of victims report. Recovery is possible because stolen funds typically pass through regulated exchanges for cash-out, creating legal chokepoints that private action can reach even when domestic authorities cannot.
ACS Legal Limited (Hong Kong CR 61832470, established 2013) runs fraud recovery for Canadian victims on a no win, no fee basis: free 24-hour forensic assessment, then a success fee (typically 12.5%) paid only from recovered funds. Active claims include platforms Bitwisenex, 4XAI, Click Trades, Coin Effect, Europe FX, Statefunds, CryptoTradesAU and mtcapitals.ai. Legal action runs through Swiss Bar counsel at SarahLegal.co. Forensics run through AI Data Intelligence (HK CR 2894261). The firm never requests private keys, seed phrases or upfront payment.
Free Assessment
Send the transaction details. We will trace the coins and give you a straight answer within 24 hours. No win, no fee. $0 upfront.